🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat state that indecision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a series of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in safer locations. Officials say it is for the community to determine how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They intended this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least a portion of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents fear it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

A local business owner recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely disappeared into the water, including its church and graveyard.

“It was possible to see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. Individuals will take bones as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Along the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His parent said she could not sleep after learning her son’s final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does trouble me to think this won’t be his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is premature to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the challenge has resulted in bereaved families feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to continue for now. Others argue the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And everybody is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with residents.”

He added there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should be done yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was labeled one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of sacred ground.