🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial policy to prohibit social media access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Officials, child protection groups, and families are observing closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising group of states are exploring similar restrictions.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for under-15s, with the PM arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' childhood". Legislation may be formalized next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a minimum age limit of 15, citing the need to shield children from the "manipulative force of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to confirm the age and identity of social media participants. Officials have indicated that an Australian-model ban is "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the leader has asked the legislature to pass a law lifting the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has endorsed a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended families to restrict their youngsters from social media until 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not enact enforceable legislation.

"An effective age limit is a useful foundation," said a leading MEP driving the resolution.

Britain: An Evidence-Based Stance

In the UK, the government has not ruled out a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is being dismissed" but stressing any decision must be "based on strong data".

Previously, support grew behind a bill to introduce controls on social media use by minors, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a girl who died after being exposed to dangerous platform posts argues that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could result in a "dangerous transition" of risk when young people turn 16.

"The Australian ban is a response to the refusal of the social media companies to create tools that are appropriate and suitable for minors," commented a leading peer.

The US: A Fragmented Landscape

Stateside, regulation is largely happening at the local government level due to federal stalemate.

• Utah requires guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• Florida has passed a bill prohibiting under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has passed a regulation capping under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with extra access requiring adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring parental consent for minors to open social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from certain individuals to copy the Australian example, a nationwide ban is presently seen as unlikely.

International Views

Outside of these regions, other countries are also taking action.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for teenagers effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international bodies take a more nuanced position. Unicef has cautioned that age-based restrictions pose dangers and "might have unintended consequences". The agency points out that social networks can be a "critical link" for marginalized young people and that government action should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve child safeguards.

While this international debate continues, the actions of the Australian government and its followers show that states globally are increasingly content to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.