🔗 Share this article

The beluga known as Jelly Bean’s daughter Bertie Botts is an adorable small “ham sandwich”. The whale Orion – called “Onion” – is a sizeable but very loyal companion. Another whale, Zephyr has “constant motion” and sways like a worm. Lillooet is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.

A group of thirty captive marine mammals in a Canadian entertainment facility have been caught in a struggle between a closed attraction, public officials and welfare campaigners.

But those working directly with the whales say the heated discussion over their destiny often overlooks the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been carefully observed by the caretakers who see them each day.

After the national authorities prevented the sale of the belugas to a foreign facility, the embattled facility near Niagara Falls where they are kept stated it would consider to put them down unless the government covers the upkeep of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that demand, placing the 30 whales in an dangerously unstable circumstance.

Highly Cognitive Marine Mammals

Scientists say that belugas’ neural makeup, along with their sound replication, intellectual tasks and communal behavior suggest they are highly cognitive mammals – something one caretaker discovered directly.

Burgess spent three years as a beluga trainer, a job that required earning the trust of the marine predators.

“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of dedication and a lot of love. At the outset, they’re very cautious of you,” she said. “Over time, you gain reciprocal understanding. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so magical and fulfilling.”

The trainer knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was nevertheless amazed by the subtleties and quirks in their personalities. She formed a particular love for a pair of whales with opposing temperaments.

“Eve accepted me. Cleo demanded work,” she said. “Each changed the way I understand connection.”

Public Concerns and Facility Decline

Burgess’s interaction with the whales developed against a backdrop of growing public opposition to their enclosure.

During her tenure at the facility, multiple belugas and the park’s one orca, the orca, passed away. In total, nineteen belugas have perished at the park since recent years, a statistic which the facility attributes to age-related causes, but which campaigners say indicates the inadequate care in which they were maintained.

The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but the former trainer says she witnessed firsthand consequences of the cessation. “Structural materials is breaking off from the pools because they’re degrading and not being maintained. The whales are inquisitive and so they pick it up and swim around with fragments in their jaws. It’s distressing to see.”

The park did not respond to a questionnaire, but earlier claimed: “The whales … get far better medical attention and constant care than any person in the UK, or anywhere else.”

Uncertain Future and Proposed Solutions

The former employee was terminated from the park in early March following the death of Eos, an sick beluga the employees had to humanely kill. She said the park believed details of the death were shared to the news outlets and she was fired not long after.

The uncertainty over the whales’ fate has left Burgess and staff members in distress. She says the facility’s warning to kill its whales is a leverage tool and is a “logistically impossible” undertaking, adding any efforts to put down even a single beluga would require “immense personnel”, equipment and specialized tools.

“It’s impossible in hell the staff would ever do it,” she said.

Burgess backs demands for the whales to be transferred immediately from the park, with its crumbling tanks and dwindling staff.

In the autumn, the nation’s government official turned down a bid to send the whales to an overseas location.

“Allowing the request would have meant a ongoing situation in captivity and a return to public entertainment,” the official commented. “As society, we know that marine mammals are meant for the sea, not in pools for our entertainment. I could not in clear conscience permit an relocation that would prolong the conditions these belugas have endured.”

But Burgess said the official’s remarks reflect a broader incorrect perception of the realities of life for belugas living their whole lives in enclosures.

“The people needs to understand these are whales that have existed solely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the foreseeable future,” she said. “The public just don’t understand that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”

Sanctuary Proposal and Continuing Discussion

As officials struggle to find a solution, suggestions have surfaced, some of which have little basis in reality. An idea called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of Canada’s north – where whales are a primary resource of sustenance for Indigenous peoples.

A proposed refuge in the region of eastern Canada, which now received government approval, has shown to be highly debated. The prospective location, which includes a large area of protected cove, is not yet built. Supporters remain optimistic that it could in time represent a sustainable resolution for eight of the whales.

But, the former trainer says, among caretakers she’s consulted, there is “skepticism there” about what she said is “merely an trial” in the whales’ well-being.

Different voices say the prospect of a sanctuary reflects a broader global shift away from captive facilities and could represent a viable plan in the coming months.

Charles Vinick, head of the initiative, said the site will simulate the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales obtain from specialists, albeit in a much larger environment. He said after the medical condition of whales is fully assessed, which could take months|an extended period|